Tuesday 23 November 2010

Classical Conditioning

Ivan Pavlov:

1. When Pavlov discovered classical conditioning, he was actually studying digestive processes in dogs.

2. First, Pavlov hooked a small tube into the dog's cheek that would capture saliva. Then, using a metronome as a stimulus, he turned on the metronome and presented the dog with food. The dog would salivate into the tube. He did this so many times that eventually all he had to do was turn on the metronome and the dog would respond and begin to salivate. This automatic learning process was called classical conditioning.

3. In Pavlov's experiments, the conditioned stimulus was the metronome after the dog began to respond to it. The unconditioned stimulus was the food and the salivation was the conditioned response.

4. Extinction occurs in classical conditioning when you stop pairing the unconditioned stimulus with the conditioned stimulus, like the metronome and the food, and the dog begins to respond to the metronome without the food. This is called extinction because the conditioned response disapears.

5. Stimilus generalization is the tendency when the conditioned stimulus creates similar responses after the response has been conditioned. For example, if the dog began to respond to a sound similar to the metronome, like a bell or a whistle.

6. Stimulus discrimination is when the subject is able to distinguish between a conditioned stimulus and other things similar to the unconditioned stimulus. For example, if the dog was able to distingiush the difference of the metronome and the whistle.

7. Two limitations of classical conditioning is that first, it is difficult to replicate because of the specific procedure and the tube in the dog's cheek and second, because humans may not have the exact learning processes as dogs.

8. Pavlov theorized that the most basic form of learning is associative learning, where the being makes associations between objects in the enviroment.

http://www.learning-theories.com/classical-conditioning-pavlov.html

http://psychology.about.com/od/classicalconditioning/a/pavlovs-dogs.htm

John B. Watson:

1. In the Little Albert study, John Watson attempted to stimulate fear in a baby boy whom he call Albert. First, Watson would present Albert with a variety of animals, including a white rat. Later, once Albert was accustomed to these animals, Watson would present him with the animals again, only this time he would make a loud noise behind the baby's head, stimulating fear. Over time, Albert began to associate his fear of the loud noise with the animals, and he became afraid of them.

2. The conditioned stimulus was the white rat, the unconditioned stimulus was the loud noise, and the conditioned response was when the baby started to cry when presented with the rat.

3. Two limitations of this study are that it is highly unethical, because it is creating fear in an innocent child, so it can't be replicated, and secondly, Watson only used one baby, so others may have responded differently.

4. Watson also stated a law of frequency, where he stressed that the more frequent a stimulus and response occur, the stronger the habit will become.
5. Watson's law of recency stated that the response that has most recently occurred after a particular stimulus is the response most likely to be associated with that stimulus.
6. Watson called behaviorism the study of people's responses while being able to predict and control these actions. Basicall he believed that people's actions and emotions could be predicted and controlled.
http://www.lifecircles-inc.com/Learningtheories/behaviorism/Watson.html
http://teachnet.edb.utexas.edu/~Lynda_abbot/Behaviorism.html
http://www.psychology.sbc.edu/Little%20Albert.htm




































































http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Albert_experiment

Monday 1 November 2010

Summaries of Sleep Articles

Starting High School One Hour Later May Reduce Teen Traffic Accidents:

The UK Health Care Good Samatarian Sleep Center in Lexington, Kentucky conducted an experiment on how sleep affects the number of car accidents which teens are involved in on their way to school early in the morning. In a county in Kansas, the group took a poll of the teen driving accidents during a two year period when the high school started at 7:30 and the middle school started at 8:00. Then the county pushed the school starting times back one hour, and for the next two years the group carefully observed the number of teen driving accidents. The observers found that the crash rates decreased 16.5% compared to the years when school started earlier. Students also reported they felt fresher and more awake at school. Scientists believe that just one more hour of sleep significantly helps these teens to be safer and more alert in school and on the road. I also believe that a little more sleep would greatly benefit students who are not able to get enough and in the long run it will help them do better in school.



High School Students With A Delayed School Start Time Sleep Longer, Report Less Daytime Sleepiness:

Zaw W. Htwe, MD, of Norwalk Hospital's Sleep Disorders Center in Norwalk, Conn. conducted an experiment on 250 high school students who completed the School Sleep Habits Questionnaire. The first thing they discovered was that the average sleep time of these students was seven hours a night, because their school started at 7:35. After the school time was delayed forty minutes, the average sleep time for school nights increased 33 minutes, to 7 and a half hours of sleep a night. Although this is not the recommended nine hours of sleep that adolescents should be getting, but students reported having less trouble with being sleepy at school. One doctor observed that the students were using 83% of the added time to get more sleep. I believe that even the smallest amount of sleep is helpful and we should all always try to get as much sleep as we can to do our best.


Delayed School Start Time Associated With Improvements in Adolescent Behaviors:

Judith A. Owens, M.D., of the Hasbro's Childrens Hospital, Providence, conducted a study on 200 students in Providence ages 14-18. For the experiment, their school start time was pushed from 8:00 to 8:30 and they were interviewed before and after the change in starting times. Studies showed that most of the students on average were getting a full hour more of sleep and seemed to be more active and reported less depressive moods. There were significantly less reported incidents of medical concerns related to fatigue and students more actively participated in school activities and the majority rated themselves in happier moods. All this caused simply by delaying the school starting time half and hour. I firmly believe all of the statistics in this article and how even a little more sleep can change a student population. I think all schools should be striving to give their students more sleep, because it is so important to us.